What must an officer determine about the level of force used according to the Objective Reasonable Test?

The correct answer focuses on the requirement for officers to assess whether the level of force used was both necessary and reasonable in the context of their duties. The Objective Reasonableness Test is a legal standard that governs the use of force by law enforcement officers, prompting them to evaluate whether their actions were appropriate based on the specific circumstances they faced at the time.

In applying this standard, officers must consider factors such as the threat posed by a suspect, the severity of the crime, and whether the suspect was actively resisting arrest or attempting to escape. By determining if the use of force was necessary and reasonable, officers ensure that their actions align with lawful practices and respect for individuals' rights.

Other considerations like whether the force was excessive or unneeded are important but do not encapsulate the core of the Objective Reasonable Test. The focus of the test is on necessity and reasonableness, which directly impacts the overall legality of the force applied in a given situation. While bureaucratic approval and legal ethics are integral to law enforcement practices, they do not specifically address the immediate evaluation required by the Objective Reasonableness Test, which is centered on the situational assessment by the officer in the field.